CLOSETS, CLOSETS, CLOSETS AND MORE CLOSETS!

Not much in the mood for words just now but since starting morally-trolling quite liking sharing my thoughts and personal opinions this is all I have to say for now........

CLOSETS

Eddie (God rest his soul) alerts to cadaver odour in apt G5A

CLOSETS

Eddie alerting to cadaver odour in villa rented by McCann's

CLOSETS

Times report that McCanns hid vital evidence

AND MORE CLOSETS

While it would appear the McCann's like to hide things in actual physical closets, the 'pro McCanns' apparently just like  to hide in the proverbial closets. I am by no means suggesting there aren't that many willing to say they are pro McCann, they are actually there in their droves but it would seem all scurrying away to find a closet (if they aren't already in one). I have come across very few both online and in the real world who are willing to speak up and actually discuss why they think 'trolls' like me are wrong. 

Of those few who did discuss or debate anything McCann related with me, I can say they were (like myself) polite and willing to hear the flip side.

I would imagine that there are tons who feel they do not know enough about the case to have any such discussion but will hear nothing which would suggest that the McCann's were in any way, shape or form involved in Madeleine's disappearance (let it be noted I do not suggest they were involved only that it is my opinion that the evidence in the P.J. files is very damning). I do not believe this group of supporters are hiding in that proverbial closet, more sitting under rocks and stones (perhaps looking for Madeleine).

The pro's who are actually in the closets are the one's who after having had their say, providing no actual evidence or sources to back up their opinions, go on to spew obscene vulgarities at anyone who does not take their word for gospel, hidden behind protected accounts that you cannot reply to either in your own personal defense on the absurd slurs to your character nor to provide any factual source to disprove their silly claims. I would like to say here that this group are only online and I have never come across such vile cases in the real world, I always imagine that one day I will and they will sit with fingers in their ears singing la la la la la la every time my mouth opens. If my grandchildren were to be present I could kill 2 birds with stone by doing my sea bass impression, keeping the childrens' innocent little ears away from the not so nice language whilst keeping them amused at the same time.

In my 6 + years of researching this case out of personal interest I have seen many comments and videos from such people, none of which provided any factual evidence, most of it including the troll like behavior that the rags have tarred non-believers with. Some of it downright defamatory! There is NEVER any way in which to engage with these people.

While I am not saying non-believers are perfect and do not have a similar group, it seems the pro type troll are much larger in numbers than the non-believer trolls. Non-believers like myself tend to encourage communication, are willing to listen to both sides of an argument and will provide fact after fact to get their side across. Pro trolls don't provide any facts but plenty of hearsay, they block any sort of communication to their own profile but are very willing to deface profile's of others. When faced with actual fact from qualified experts in their own field the pro will go on to discredit said expert any which way they can (usually echoing Gerry McCann with the words incredibly unreliable and no other reasoning behind that).

What else is hiding in closets?

At that I will leave you with some food for thought, not hidden in any closet or small space like a refrigerator but out there in the open, free for anyone who wishes to embark on a factual reading session or 2.

Martin Grimes report (10 pages, includes report of searches in Praia da Luz, experience, training, accreditation and case samples of dogs and dog handler) - http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm 

Video of dog searches (over 90 mins) -  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4NMYPsFKb8

Sunday times article referenced in image - http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/crime/article3906190.ece

Official P.J. Files - http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk 
 *Note I feel it necessary to mention that the McCanns paid £100,000 for their copy of the official P.J. Files to be translated into English. They have never made these files available to anyone. The mccannpjfiles site (and many forums) contains the official files available to anyone for free, many of which have already been translated into English by volunteers (and they continue to translate the vast amount for free even today, 5 years after they became available). I would like to give my thanks to all the volunteers for their very hard work and their dedication. 


As always my posts are either fact or my thoughts and opinions and are not intended to harm anyone or any company, libelous or otherwise. Your thoughts and opinions are always welcome.

Keep trolling - morally
Morag Trollop - morally-trolling


 

What is morally trolling all about?

Let me see, where do I begin?

I am just a normal every day grandmother. At least that's my view but everyone is entitled to an opinion, aren't they? I do try to be open minded about many things, after all none of us are perfect, some just think they are! But I do at times get pretty heat up about some things that I have an opinion on and well I do like to get my point across, as we all do.

I have my own opinions about the whole Madeleine McCann case and have followed the case closely since the very beginning. I have trawled through many many blogs, forums, news articles, videos and even the official police files on numerous occasions. I do not claim to be or even pretend to be an expert on the subject (or any other for that matter). I am not intending to offend anyone, accuse anyone or even be libelous towards anyone or any company.

Up until now any opinions I have aired on the Madeleine case have all been offline among friends and I will admit that it wouldn't be the first time I have heard one of them say "Oh my God how can you think such a thing?". Obviously I then go on to explain whatever opinion of mine they have been shocked at and I do give them what I feel are very good reasons, I tell them where to find the evidence to back up what I have said. I don't convince them every time but like I said everyone is entitled to have their own opinion and I do not ever expect everybody to share mine. I certainly don't make comments to entice a row with someone who doesn't share the same opinions. I have respect for their opinions and expect others to have respect for mine. I intend to conduct my online self in the same way. Morally.

Anyway enough about me as this (my very 1st blog post on my very 1st blog) is supposed to be about this blog morally-trolling. Like I said I do not usually air my opinions about Madeleine's case online but have been to many other places where opinions of others are aired along with facts and evidence and I have total respect for these places and the people who do post there, so much so that when somebody says anything personal that would perhaps upset or offend them, it also upsets and offends me. Just because I haven't said anything there doesn't mean that I'm not a part of that online community. Over the years many offensive things have been said and well to me it has been like water off a duck's back but recently the Mirror has labelled people online who are not necessarily anti-McCann but do believe the facts presented by the Portuguese police as "Vile Trolls". http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/vile-trolls-target-madeleine-mccann-2472668 It was this article that made me think maybe I should use my online voice.

Yes I have read the article, yes I do take offense to it. I do not condone the behavior of some that have been quoted in the article, e.g. the kidnapping of the twins, or prank calls of any sort but then I always do take what's in newspapers with a pinch of salt (and sometimes vinegar). The actions or words of a very small minority do not in anyway accurately describe the rest of the community, most are just normal people like myself who are caring enough to seek justice for a little missing girl they do not even know, just because they do not believe the same as you does not make them all vile like the minority who were quoted. It certainly doesn't make them a troll, for a description of internet troll see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll  Going on that description in the wiki link I am far from a troll as are the many people I have come across in that online community. The majority of them post relevant comments in places where they ARE meant to be posted and I feel it is high time I opened my online mouth to stick up for them. I do not mean harm, I will be aiming to post only facts and/or my opinions and if that makes me or anyone who agrees with me a troll then so be it. It is from this I then get the name morally-trolling for my blog. Hope you like it!

I myself, like some mentioned in the Mirror's article, considered phoning Crime Watch to say I thought the e-fit was very like Gerry McCann. They were pictures that I had already seen, a long time ago, I'm not sure where but think it was maybe from the police files (I will double check when I have more time and update this post accordingly). I didn't phone Crime Watch but only because I knew I would not be taken seriously, not because I didn''t think the e-fits look very like Gerry.  I already know that Goncala Amaral and his team of police officers had already taken witness statements from the Smith family and it is my understanding that these descriptions were used to produce the e-fits. A few months after giving their statements the Smiths called back to say that when they saw Gerry McCann get off the plane carrying his son Sean, they recognized him as the man they saw carry the little girl at around 10pm the night of 3rd May 2007 heading towards the sea. These are not just my ramblings, these details are all in the official police files including the statements taken from the Smiths. So I am left slightly confused at why Crime Watch are saying new details have come to light and these are new e-fits.

This weeks Sunday Times article about the McCanns paying Oakley to investigate the case back in 2008 then later threatening them with legal action to keep the report from being made public knowledge gave me that extra push to start my blog (and further confused me on the origins of the 'new e-fits'). The Oakley PI's send a report which is very similar to that of the Portuguese police reports and the McCanns threaten legal action to hush it up! Really? The parents of a missing child pay half a million pounds to private investigators then dismiss the findings as "Hypercritical of the McCanns and their friends". The parents who have vowed to do everything possible to find their daughter, spend that much in publicly donated money for a report, then hide it? Five years of suppression!

Quite cheeky of them when you think that Portugal's respected officer Goncala Amaral has been in court the last few years on a libel charge for hindering the search for Madeleine. Isn't it sitting on reports that is hindering the search? Or perhaps the continuous changes to the events of that time which are confusing possible witnesses or sightings? There are lots and lots of unanswered questions (more than 48) which may or may not be hindering the case but let's not digress. The article in the Sunday Times was I feel a very brave article and the editor would be a fool if any word of it is untrue or hearsay!

So how is it that I have previously seen the e-fits? Were they obtained by police in Portugal or by the PI as suggested in the Sunday Times, or from the Scotland Yard enquiry? Either way they are said to be from the Smith's and as they say in Crime Watch these 'new' findings change the timeline so hopefully now Madeleine will be found soon.

And so here it is my very first blog and if you have managed to stay through my ramblings as far this point then thank you for taking the time and welcome to morrally-trolling.

I have no idea as yet what my next post will be or even when but I'm sure I will soon have more opinions or ramblings to air, perhaps on a subject far from the Madeleine McCann case. Maybe one of you would like to hear my opinion on something? Do post and let me know and if I have any on your chosen subject I will share them in a future post.

UPDATED:17/11/2013 - Sunday Times article moved, link updated. As yet I am still not able to locate were I had already seen those 'new' e-fits several years ago.

Keep trolling.....morally.
Morag Trollop,  morally-trolling.